In her preliminary reply, Lakra emphasized the procedural issues surrounding the complaints filed against her. She pointed out that the complaints were addressed to the Secretary-General rather than the President of Hockey India, raising questions about the legitimacy of the Ethics Committee's involvement. “Under the bylaws of Hockey India adopted on June 20, 2026, the Ethics Committee does not possess original or suo-motu jurisdiction,” she stated. According to Lakra, any complaint that falls under the Ethics Committee's purview must first be reviewed and referred in writing by the President, who serves as the gatekeeper for such matters. “Until such a written reference is made by the President, the Ethics Committee cannot initiate any inquiry,” she asserted.
Furthermore, Lakra has expressed concerns regarding the authority of the Ethics Committee and its chairman to conduct inquiries independently. She argued that the committee is intended to function as a collective body and must operate with a valid quorum. “The Ethics Committee must act as a body and not through a single individual,” she noted, questioning the legitimacy of the notice issued to her, particularly since the Secretary-General is also a person of interest in the ongoing situation. Lakra's response highlights significant procedural and ethical concerns regarding the handling of the allegations against her, as well as the broader implications for the governance of Hockey India.
