Cricket

Ethics expert reveals whispers of wider involvement in 2018 ball-tampering scandal

  • Authored By: Sports Now
  • Updated Nov 14, 2026, 12:43 IST

Dr. Simon Longstaff, who led the Cricket Australia culture review following the 2018 Sandpapergate incident, has disclosed that he heard suggestions that more players were aware of the ball-tampering plot than those officially sanctioned.

Ethics expert reveals whispers of wider involvement in 2018 ball-tampering scandal

Dr. Simon Longstaff, the ethics expert tasked by Cricket Australia to conduct a cultural review following the 2018 ball-tampering scandal, has revealed that he received reports suggesting a wider group of players may have been aware of the incident than the three individuals ultimately punished. During the investigation, Longstaff noted that he encountered persistent whispers indicating that the plot was not limited to those who faced disciplinary action.

Speaking on Nine's Weekend Today, Longstaff explained that he provided senior players with a formal opportunity to disclose any additional information regarding the events in Cape Town. Despite these efforts, no players chose to amend their original statements, leaving the investigation without sufficient evidence to pursue further inquiries at the time. Longstaff acknowledged that the whispers also hinted at the possibility that ball-tampering may have occurred prior to the Test match in South Africa.

Investigation scope and player involvement

The review, which extended beyond the playing squad to include sponsors, supporters, and former Test players, was conducted under strict confidentiality. Regarding claims made by Usman Khawaja in his book, Sabr, that he was never interviewed despite his willingness to participate, Longstaff stated he could not recall the specific list of invitees. He noted that participation was voluntary and not every individual invited chose to contribute to the process.

Longstaff also addressed the current discourse surrounding the incident, describing the sincerity of Australia captain Pat Cummins during recent press conferences as convincing. He stated his belief that Cummins was unaware of the plot, though he acknowledged this does not definitively resolve questions regarding the extent of knowledge among the broader playing group. He suggested that it remains a matter for Cricket Australia to determine whether they wish to investigate the conflicting accounts further.

Warner alleges investigation flaws

The comments from the ethics expert follow public criticism from David Warner, who recently accused Cricket Australia of conducting a flawed investigation. Warner questioned whether senior bowlers Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc, and Nathan Lyon were interviewed by officials in 2018. In a social media post, Warner argued that if those bowlers were not interviewed, the organization’s stance that they were unaware of the ball-tampering plan is questionable.

Warner, who received a one-year ban alongside then-captain Steve Smith, suggested that the investigation was designed to assign blame to a specific group while maintaining a narrative that excluded the bowling unit. The 2018 incident also resulted in a nine-month suspension for Cameron Bancroft. Longstaff’s recent remarks have reignited questions regarding the depth and transparency of the original inquiry conducted by the governing body.